Day 1 Welcome
Psychology & University Libraries
…Scientists in the haematology and oncology department at the biotechnology firm Amgen…tried to confirm published findings…[from] fifty-three…‘landmark’ studies.
…findings were confirmed in only 6 (11%) cases.
Even knowing the limitations of preclinical research, this was a shocking result.
…The initial aim of the project was to repeat 193 experiments from 53 high-impact papers…However, the various barriers and challenges we encountered while designing and conducting the experiments meant that we were only able to repeat 50 experiments from 23 papers…
Errington, Denis, Perfito, Iorns, & Nosek (2021)
…the data needed to compute effect sizes and conduct power analyses was publicly accessible for just 4 of 193 experiments…none of the 193 experiments were described in sufficient detail in the original paper to enable us to design protocols to repeat the experiments…
Errington et al. (2021)
…While authors were extremely or very helpful for 41% of experiments, they were minimally helpful for 9% of experiments, and not at all helpful (or did not respond to us) for 32% of experiments…
Errington et al. (2021)
…This experience draws attention to a basic and fundamental concern about replication – it is hard to assess whether reported findings are credible.
Errington et al. (2021)
Figure 1: % of U.S. adults who said science has had a(n) ___ effect on society
Figure 2: % of U.S. adults who say…
Houtkoop et al. (2018) Figure 2
Tenopir et al. (2020)
…the idea that we all hope you have learned in studying science in school…It’s a kind of scientific integrity, a principle of scientific thought that corresponds to a kind of utter honesty…
“The first principle is that you must not fool yourself—and you are the easiest person to fool. So you have to be very careful about that. After you’ve not fooled yourself, it’s easy not to fool other scientists.”
Courage is resistance to fear, mastery of fear—not absence of fear.
The mores of science possess a methodologic rationale…They are procedurally efficent…
https://teacherhead.com/2017/02/27/reinventing-the-wheel-again/
Figure 3: https://penn-state-open-science.github.io/bootcamp-2025/
This talk was produced using Quarto, using the RStudio Integrated Development Environment (IDE), version 2025.5.1.513.
The source files are in R and R Markdown, then rendered to HTML using the revealJS framework. The HTML slides are hosted in a GitHub repo and served by GitHub pages: https://penn-state-open-science.github.io/bootcamp-2025-day-1-welcome/
Open Scholarship Bootcamp 2025 • Day 1 | © 2025 by Rick Gilmore under CC BY 4.0